Hasta la vista

gadgetrove_resigns_200w.jpg

So Bush’s “brain” will leave office at the end of the month. After all the damage Karl Rove has wreaked upon this country, that’s IT? He simply walks away? As John Edwards said about the matter: “Goodbye. Good riddance!”

Lest you start getting misty, here are a few choice quotes from the master puppeteer:

ON VOTING
As people do better, they start voting like Republicans – unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing.

ON 9/11
Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 in the attacks and prepared for war; liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers.

ON THE IRAQ WAR
Cindy Sheehan is a clown. There is no real anti-war movement. No serious politician, with anything to do with anything, would show his face at an anti-war rally.

ON DEMOCRATS
I think it’s dawning on some Democrats that obstructing the Patriot Act, like they’ve been obstructing everything else, is bad for them politically. At the core, we are dealing with two parties that have fundamentally different views of the world and fundamentally different views on national security. Republicans have a post-9/11 view of the world, and Democrats have a pre-9/11 view of the world.

Should Cindy Run?

cindy3.jpg

Cindy Sheehan speaks at a Columbia rally on Sept. 14, 2005.

The SC Progressive Network helped bring Cindy Sheehan to Columbia in the fall of 2005 for a rally and candlelight vigil at Martin Luther King Park. She and a handful of other family members of soldiers killed in Iraq stopped by on a 42-city, 28-state Bring Them Home Now Tour. It was an ambitious project, and it was easy to read the exhaustion on their faces. Day after day, they drove many miles, ate bad food, slept where they could, and told their awful stories.

cindy1.jpg

Cindy hugs Stan Goff – former Democracy South colleague and an organizer of the “Bring Them Home Now Tour” – before addressing the crowd of about 200.

I met Cindy briefly and was struck by her warmth. But what stuck with me was how very tired she appeared. It was impossible not to admire her sense of commitment and depth of passion. At the risk of sounding trite, she truly was an inspiration to me and other activists starved for leadership and a consistent, clear voice in the anti-war movement.

That said, I was uneasy to hear last week about Cindy’s intention to run for Nancy Pelosi’s seat. While the Speaker has been a major disappointment – as have her spineless Democratic cohorts on the Hill – Cindy stands little chance of mounting a serious challenge. And while I’m glad that Cindy is back in the game, I wish she would stick to the platform she has worked so hard to construct for herself. I worry that her campaign for Congress will only make her look foolish and ineffective. The piece below, written by one of her supporters, does nothing to quell my fears.

Becci Robbins

*********

A Personal Vision for Cindy Sheehan’s Campaign
by Daniel Ellsberg

[Remarks of Daniel Ellsberg at a press conference Aug. 9, 2007, at which Cindy Sheehan announced her independent candidacy for the 8th Congressional District of California, an office now held by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House.]

I don’t speak for Cindy Sheehan – whom I admire unreservedly – or for her campaign. When I say “we” in what follows, I’m really just giving my own perspective on this campaign, as one of her supporters.

I see this campaign as aiming much higher than putting Cindy Sheehan in Congress in 2009. Well before that time, we aim to help restore our Constitution, to end a war and avert starting a new one, and to remove from power two officials – George W. Bush and Richard Cheney – who block those objectives before they can do more harm in their remaining months in office.

That’s an ambitious project; but there’s a clear path to achieving it. We will work to change public awareness and, as a result, Nancy Pelosi’s policies as Speaker of the House well before the election, by revealing to the public real alternatives to the courses she and the Democrats have followed so far, and demonstrating the breadth and strength of public support for those alternatives.

The truth is that Democrats, and even Republicans, can do much better than they have been doing, under Pelosi’s leadership in the House, to protect our freedoms and our security. In this campaign we will publicize specifics of what can and should be done, and let the public tell the politicians which approach they want.

One essential demand is for Pelosi to encourage, rather than to block, Congressional investigations of past and ongoing administration deception, unwisdom, illegality and unconstitutionality in pursuing an aggressive war and in curtailing our rights. Such investigations, calling forth testimony under oath of current and former officials many of whom are eager to tell the truth at last, as well as demonstrating continued administration stonewalling, will almost surely lead to what does not yet exist: irresistible pressure from a belatedly-informed public for the impeachment and removal of Bush and Cheney.

Further, we need Pelosi’s leadership in rescinding the unconstitutional parts – which will not leave much – of the Patriot Acts, the Military Commissions Act and the recent, outrageous legislation purporting to legalize warrantless wiretaps and data mining. And – absolutely essential to ending our war in Iraq, ever – public pressure is needed to demand that Congress defund our indefinite occupation, providing funds only for the orderly, safe withdrawal of all our troops, contractors and bases on an announced time-table.

If this campaign can help bring about even the first of these, it will also, almost incidentally, put Cindy Sheehan within reach of success in the election. This is, in fact, a historic campaign opportunity, exploiting an opening unique in American politics. At this moment, Cindy appears to face insuperable odds, opposing without party support a powerful, heavily-funded incumbent. But we aim to change that. All we are asking is for Nancy Pelosi to do what she should: to uphold her oath of office, which is not to obey a Commander-in-Chief or to enlarge a Democratic majority but to uphold and defend the Constitution.

If we can induce her to do that, then a year from now Cindy Sheehan should be running for an open seat, or against a brand-new incumbent appointed by our Republican governor. Nancy Pelosi, third in line for succession when Bush and Cheney are impeached and removed, will be in the White House. That will, as it happens, leave an open field for Cindy.

So you see, it’s nothing personal for us. After all, as representatives of big business go, Nancy Pelosi is better than most. We don’t aim to kick her out of politics, we aim to kick her upstairs. And there’s a bonus: President Pelosi as a write-in candidate in November. She’s far from ideal, from the point of view of members of this campaign, but for a Democrats we could do a lot worse. Off the record, some of us see this as the best strategy for keeping Hillary out of the White House without letting a Republican in.

So there it is: a vision for 2009 that can evoke some real enthusiasm: Cindy in the House, Pelosi in the White House, the US out of Iraq. Our Constitution back, and Bush and Cheney under criminal indictment.

cindy2.jpg

A makeshift memorial to Cindy’s son, Casey (in center photo), who was killed in Iraq.

Fighting Global Warming Right Here, Right Now

The Convergence for Climate Action’s Southeast gathering is happening quietly this week in the mountains near Asheville.

converge2.jpg

This is the first of what the organizers hope to be an annual event. The primary goals, according to a handout, are “to overcome feelings of isolation and helplessness by bringing people together to create a community of resistance. We hope the convergence inspires people to take action, share ideas and start organizing in their own localities and spheres of interest. (For details, you can check out their web site. For background on the issues and ways to plug into the movement, see the Nuclear Information and Resource Service’s Web site.)

The week’s schedule is packed with workshops designed to grow awareness and build organizing skills among participants, who came from as far as Florida and DC to join the gathering. Workshops included media and fundraising training, puppet building and street theater, and panel discussions on a variety of topics.

converge1.jpg

Network Director Brett Bursey chats with Mary Olson, director of Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS).

On Friday, Brett was invited to speak on a panel titled “Elders of the Movement.” He and the others on the panel talked about how and why to fight the fallout of corportate greed and environmental exploitation that is destroying our country. The panel held court in a campfire circle that included kids as young as 10 and seniors old enough to nod out during the discussion.

converge4.jpg

Event organizer Glenn Carroll, center, directs preparations for a Nagasaki remembrance Friday evening.

converge3.jpg

Vegetarian meals were eaten al fresco.

As fellow organizers, we were gratified and energized by our time at the camp. With so much work to be done and such paltry resources to do it, we take strength in knowing there are more of “us” (people who care about the health of the planet and all of its residents) than “them” (corporate and political interests that benefit from the current power structure). We just need to mobilize and harness that energy.

We look forward to next year’s gathering.

Becci Robbins

NC Passes Clean Elections Reform

Big news from North Carolina yesterday! After the House passed the Voter-Owned Elections Act (VOEA) earlier this week, the state Senate followed the House’s lead and approved the VOEA, which will bring Clean Elections campaign reform to three of North Carolina’s Council of State seats. Once the governor signs the bill, and it looks like he will, candidates for State Auditor, Insurance Commissioner and Superintendent of Public Instruction will have the opportunity to opt in to a full public financing for their campaigns. (Candidates for the Supreme and Appellate courts in the state do now.)

North Carolina, which has pioneered the judicial public financing program, has been looking to expand their Voter-Owned Elections policy to other offices. After a series of pay-to-play scandals, which just recently led to the conviction of former House Speaker Jim Black, the state is anxious to take action against corruption and this bill is a great first step. Just as judicial public financing paved the way for this bill, so too should this program lead to Clean Elections for all Council of State races and, eventually, legislative and statewide races.

Toward Truthyness in Sex Ed

Title V Abstinence-Only Funding Proposal to Reauthorize with Important Fixes

Yesterday, as part of the Congress’ consideration of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), the U.S. House proposed reauthorizing part of Title V of the Social Security Act, which provides states with $50 million in funding for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. The program is set to expire next month. The proposed reauthorization has improvements that would:

* require funded programs to contain medically and scientifically accurate information;
* give states the flexibility to use funds for more comprehensive programs which discuss abstinence, but may also include information on birth control;
* require funded programs to have been proven effective at decreasing teen pregnancy, STD, and HIV/AIDS rates.

“We commend the Democratic leaders in the House for tackling this difficult issue and recognizing that the future will not hold unlimited federal funding for the failed and extreme abstinence-only-until-marriage industry,” said William Smith, vice president for public policy at the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS).

The measure passed the House 225-204. The Senate has not yet acted on Title V reauthorization.

Stop Fat Cats

This is from Public Campaign:

Tell Congress to Support the Fair Elections Now Act

When will elections be about voters instead of campaign donors? Clean elections systems have worked in Arizona, Maine and elsewhere. If we want progress on national issues, it’s time for public financing of congressional campaigns.

It’s no secret that the skyrocketing costs of congressional campaigns have turned our political system into what amounts to legalized bribery. Politicians feel compelled to raise huge sums of cash from special interests – often the very same people they’re supposed to be regulating.

Continue reading

Time for a Moratorium on Children?

overpopulation1.jpg

Thank you, Al Guess, for saying that which few dare to speak, even by the greenest of environmentalists. In a letter to the editor in last week’s The State, he wrote:

Bob Guild of the Sierra Club espouses the “conservationist” approach to global warming and says we must start now. I agree — with two caveats:
1. “Now” is at least 100 years too late.
2. Population creates demand for fuel use. No amount of conservation will be effective unless we curb worldwide population. That includes by each individual in the United States.

Since the traditional attempts have failed, the only workable solution I see is a worldwide monetary incentive program. I wish the Sierra Club and others would take a leap forward from their slow-moving, somewhat politically correct approach.

AL GUESS, Columbia

His letter prompted this one, which ran today:

Al Guess writes Saturday that we need to “curb worldwide population” to fight global warming. Regardless of how much this tactic may help reduce greenhouse gases, I am disturbed by the inhumane nature of this suggestion. Does not promoting “curbing of the population” indicate a belief that human beings are some kind of disease? Human beings are the reason that we should be trying to improve the environment. The more, the merrier!

GREG GOEBEL, Columbia

I’m afraid Mr. Goebel makes Mr. Guess’ point, but that’s neither here nor there.

The point is, with all this talk about global warming, perhaps it’s time to question our casual attitude toward making babies. Lord knows there are more than enough already here, many without homes. Don’t we have a moral obligation to tend to them first? And don’t we owe Mother Earth a break? She is already drowning in our waste.

Every baby adds to the strain on the environment. Their diapers alone are a problem. Consider these numbers, posted on the cloth diaper service web site Punkin Butt.

For every baby diapered with single-use diapers for a 2 1/2 year period, over 2 tons of waste is generated. Disposable diapers make up the 3rd largest single consumer item in our waste system – following newspapers and beverage containers. They account for nearly 4% of the total amount of solid waste, and 30% of the non-biodegradable waste. It takes 500 years for one disposable diaper to decompose. Yes, while a cloth diaper, if it is ever thrown away, will become one with the earth within six months, a disposable diaper will just sit there and do what it was made to do: absorb. Ever seen a disposable diaper get wet? A child’s disposable diapers sit in a landfill and continue to swell and absorb water.

So why isn’t population control a topic worth debate? It seems past time we give it serious thought. The forward-thinking Alice Walker has.

Her latest book, We Are the Ones We Have Been Waiting For, includes a graduation address she gave to students at Agnes Scott College in 2000. She said, “I believe there should be a moratorium on the birth of children. That not one more child should be born on this planet until certain conditions are met.”

She goes on to list the ills of the world weighing heavily on her mind (poverty, plutonium, pollution, animals in cages). In the end she concedes, “You will have children, the majority of you. Some of you may already have them. You will not listen to me at all… Have your work in the world, and have your children. Only one, please, out of respect for the weight we are to our Mother. But be aware that the other children of the world are your responsibility as well. You must learn to see them, to feel them, as yours. Until you do, there is no way you can make your own child feel safe.”

Amen, sister Alice. Amen.

Becci Robbins

Tracking the $$$ Trail in Dixie

The Institute for Southern Studies reports:

The presidential money race is well under way, and moving faster than ever. According to campaign finance data released July 15, White House hopefuls are smashing all fundraising records, collecting over $265 million in contributions in the first six months of 2007 alone. But what role is the South – one of the country’s fastest-growing regions, and home to 31% of the Electoral College votes needed to win the presidency – playing in the 2008 fundraising derby?

A new analysis of campaign records by the Institute finds that the five top fundraising campaigns in each party have collected over $45 million from 13 Southern states.

It’s a staggering sum – but only 16% of the national total, revealing the South’s campaign contributions have yet to catch up with the region’s electoral clout.

Continue reading